currently making my way through Tolstoy's The Kingdom of God is Within You the tome which served as a great inspiration for Gandhi's peaceful resistance movement. Tolstoy presents a pretty radical view of Christianity, one that i imagine wouldn't sit well with a lot of Christians - he pretty much rejects anything other than the Gospels for example - and it doesn't surprise me that its publication was suppressed by the church and state authorities of its day.
while i don't agree entirely with his complete dismissal of ritual, i must admit he argues his case extremely well and offers a refreshing take on what it must mean to live a life in imitation of Christ - in his eyes the complete adherence to a well known passage from the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5: 38-39 "Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also."
combined with his criticism of church and state, both of which he argues as fundamentally opposed to and contradictive of Christ's injuctions (1 COR 7: 23) Tolstoy has come to be seen as somewhat of a godfather figure to the anarcho-pacifists.
reading through, one thing that's grabbed my attention is his response in chapter 2 to a criticism levelled at his advocation of non-resistance -
"even if to use force against wicked men had been permitted by God, since it is impossible to find a perfect and unfailing distinction by which one could positively know the wicked from the good, so it would come to all individual men and societies of men mutually regarding each other as wicked men, as is the case now."
i was very much reminded with these words, of Shinran's own conception of the impossibility of comprehending what is truly good and what is truly evil such as Amida knows found in the third postcript of the Tannisho -
I know nothing at all of good or evil. For if I could know thoroughly, as Amida Tathagata knows, that an act was good, then I would know good. If I could know thoroughly, as the Tathagata knows, that an act was evil, then I would know evil. But with a foolish being full of blind passions, in this fleeting world- this burning house- all matters without exception are empty and false, totally without truth and sincerity. The nembutsu alone is true and real.
while i acknowledge that there is a difference here in that Shinran is speaking about thorough knowledge of good and evil acts in and of themselves whereas Tolstoy is focussing on distinction between the two whereby positive knowledge of both is arrived at, nonetheless i think the comparison bears up.
it's interesting at least if nothing else and i may return to these thoughts the further into Tolstoy's tome i go.
namu amida butsu
Showing posts with label tannisho. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tannisho. Show all posts
Tuesday, 29 December 2009
Saturday, 31 October 2009
The Human Body - a Cage of Suffering or a Precious Gift?
my first night back at work last week after having spent a precious fortnight visiting family and attending Shokai. i walked through the door to immediately hear the unfortunate news that several colleagues have contracted swine flu. now, i could go into detail about how the swine flu pandemic is a convenient excuse employed by government and media to re-affirm and strengthen the culture of moral panic and fear we live in (don't forget to check under the bed for any terrorists hiding there before you turn out the light) but that's not really the issue i want to reflect on here and further, i think it'd be a tad insensitive of me to do so given this news.
instead, i want to address the view of the human body found in the Buddha's teachings and how this view can be verified in real-life encounters and experiences. let's start by looking at what the Sutta Pitaka has to say. in the Saccavibhanga Sutta, Sariputta gives a detailed step by step analysis of the four noble truths, beginning with the truth of dukkha. for the purpose of the discussion at hand i'd like to focus on two ways in which we experience this suffering which Venerable Sariputta highlights for us -
- MN 141, Saccavibhanga Sutta: An Analysis of the Truths
it doesn't paint a pretty picture does it? but as long as we have these bodies then we are subject to both pain and aging. i think of my work friends lying in bed at home, in pain and discomfort and am reminded of the many times i have been ill - the headaches, the difficulty breathing, the temperatures, the pain in ones' throat, the vomiting, the nausea, the loss of sleep, the feeling of exhaustion.
and again, it may seem premature to consider aging at the (relatively!) young age of 29 but the fact of the matter is, from the minute we come into this life we begin to age. the stark reality of this hit home in a particularly forceful manner earlier last week as i was asked to help one of the nurses bathe a patient at the hospice i volunteer at. seeing the frailness of this patient's body, the complete dependency on others to help with what we take so often for granted as such a simple act of washing oneself reminded me that it is a real possibility i too may one day rely on others to perform this and other everyday tasks for me, just as i did during my first years of life.
but if all this seems to portray the human body as a purely negative source of constant affliction and suffering then i can't help but feel we're missing an important point somewhere. this point revealed itself to me in a very implicit way whilst reciting the nembutsu yesterday. but before we get to that, let's go back to the sutta and look at what Sakyamuni has to say about Sariputta -
now it's not my intention to clarify the intent in such a comparison, i believe the Buddha's meaning is readily apparent here. rather, to focuss on the implications of such an image for the discussion at hand. consider those words - like the mother giving birth. much as our human bodies are a source of suffering they are also the precious gift bestowed to us by our parents. how can something that causes us pain, withers and eventually dies be seen as such? it is simply this - as the nembutsu came from my lips, as i bowed my head to the floor before the Buddha i was made aware that without this body i had been given by my parents i would not be able to perform such acts. i would not be able to hear the Dharma, read the Dharma, discuss the Dharma or praise the Dharma. Sariputta, if not for his parents would not have been able to clarify the Buddha's teachings.
didn't Sakyamuni also tell us that this human birth was rare? that it provided the best opportunity to practice Dharma? don't we owe our very ability to practice to our parents? and this is why, although it may be a cage for our suffering it is also a precious gift, a gift because it is freely given and precious because the Buddhadharma is immeasurable in value, both to oneself and to others around oneself.
don't we have a duty then to look after and care for this gift? shamefully, when i consider all that i've done to this body of mine and all that i've used it for, i see how little i've valued the boundless kindness of my parents. i've put intoxicants into it, junk food into it, denied it the rest it's badly needed. i've used it to utter harsh words or spread gossip or lie.
it is not just that this body is a precious gift but that in order for it to be given, ones' mother must put herself through an incredible amount of physical pain that even ends sometimes in, well let's be honest about it - tragedy. no, in fact let's be frank about it - death. lest we forget, Sakyamuni's own mother Maya laid down her life in giving birth to him.
clearly then, this is not a gift to be taken lightly, handled roughly and abused and mistreated at ones' own selfish leisure. how can we ever begin to repay this debt, if indeed we can at all? well, i believe the answer is there in that last quote - simply put, to continue to practice Buddhadharma. in the case of Sariputta it was to teach and lead fellow aspirants to stream-entry. but one may well, as a lay-person, feel a twinge of apprehension at such a lofty goal (i mean, come on Jon! we're talking about Sariputta here!). but practice is not limited exclusively to this worthy objective. one day our parents will grow old, their bodies become increasingly frail and their dependency on their children to return the love and compassion they have given them throughout their lives by helping them bathe, walk, provide clothing and food increase. such love and compassion returned is this practice. and although we can never hope to fully repay what they have done for us during our lives, this care is our means of acknowledging and respecting it.
ofcourse, i've only touched briefly and limitedly on the issue and certainly the practice of Buddhadharma is much more than just caring for one's parents. and this care and love we return to them should not be put off or postponed until their old age, rather it is a life long practice. similarly, we are not indebted exclusively, and neither should our compassion be limited to, them. it is much, much greater than that. and, with this point in mind i would like to close with a quote from the Tannisho which really illustrates how far this debt extends and provides much more to consider -
"As for me, Shinran, I have never said the nembutsu even once for the repose of my departed father and mother. For all sentient beings, without exception, have been our parents and brothers and sisters in the course of countless lives in the many states of existence. On attaining Buddhahood after this present life, we can save every one of them.
- Tannisho Ch. 5
namu amida butsu
instead, i want to address the view of the human body found in the Buddha's teachings and how this view can be verified in real-life encounters and experiences. let's start by looking at what the Sutta Pitaka has to say. in the Saccavibhanga Sutta, Sariputta gives a detailed step by step analysis of the four noble truths, beginning with the truth of dukkha. for the purpose of the discussion at hand i'd like to focus on two ways in which we experience this suffering which Venerable Sariputta highlights for us -
"And what is aging? Whatever aging, decrepitude, brokenness, graying, wrinkling, decline of life-force, weakening of the faculties of the various beings in this or that group of beings, that is called aging.
[...]
"And what is pain? Whatever is experienced as bodily pain, bodily discomfort, pain or discomfort born of bodily contact, that is called pain."
- MN 141, Saccavibhanga Sutta: An Analysis of the Truths
it doesn't paint a pretty picture does it? but as long as we have these bodies then we are subject to both pain and aging. i think of my work friends lying in bed at home, in pain and discomfort and am reminded of the many times i have been ill - the headaches, the difficulty breathing, the temperatures, the pain in ones' throat, the vomiting, the nausea, the loss of sleep, the feeling of exhaustion.
and again, it may seem premature to consider aging at the (relatively!) young age of 29 but the fact of the matter is, from the minute we come into this life we begin to age. the stark reality of this hit home in a particularly forceful manner earlier last week as i was asked to help one of the nurses bathe a patient at the hospice i volunteer at. seeing the frailness of this patient's body, the complete dependency on others to help with what we take so often for granted as such a simple act of washing oneself reminded me that it is a real possibility i too may one day rely on others to perform this and other everyday tasks for me, just as i did during my first years of life.
but if all this seems to portray the human body as a purely negative source of constant affliction and suffering then i can't help but feel we're missing an important point somewhere. this point revealed itself to me in a very implicit way whilst reciting the nembutsu yesterday. but before we get to that, let's go back to the sutta and look at what Sakyamuni has to say about Sariputta -
" Like the mother giving birth: That's Sariputta. [...] Sariputta trains [others] to the fruit of stream-entry; [...] Sariputta is capable of declaring, teaching, describing, setting forth, revealing, explaining, and making plain the four noble truths in detail."
now it's not my intention to clarify the intent in such a comparison, i believe the Buddha's meaning is readily apparent here. rather, to focuss on the implications of such an image for the discussion at hand. consider those words - like the mother giving birth. much as our human bodies are a source of suffering they are also the precious gift bestowed to us by our parents. how can something that causes us pain, withers and eventually dies be seen as such? it is simply this - as the nembutsu came from my lips, as i bowed my head to the floor before the Buddha i was made aware that without this body i had been given by my parents i would not be able to perform such acts. i would not be able to hear the Dharma, read the Dharma, discuss the Dharma or praise the Dharma. Sariputta, if not for his parents would not have been able to clarify the Buddha's teachings.
didn't Sakyamuni also tell us that this human birth was rare? that it provided the best opportunity to practice Dharma? don't we owe our very ability to practice to our parents? and this is why, although it may be a cage for our suffering it is also a precious gift, a gift because it is freely given and precious because the Buddhadharma is immeasurable in value, both to oneself and to others around oneself.
don't we have a duty then to look after and care for this gift? shamefully, when i consider all that i've done to this body of mine and all that i've used it for, i see how little i've valued the boundless kindness of my parents. i've put intoxicants into it, junk food into it, denied it the rest it's badly needed. i've used it to utter harsh words or spread gossip or lie.
it is not just that this body is a precious gift but that in order for it to be given, ones' mother must put herself through an incredible amount of physical pain that even ends sometimes in, well let's be honest about it - tragedy. no, in fact let's be frank about it - death. lest we forget, Sakyamuni's own mother Maya laid down her life in giving birth to him.
clearly then, this is not a gift to be taken lightly, handled roughly and abused and mistreated at ones' own selfish leisure. how can we ever begin to repay this debt, if indeed we can at all? well, i believe the answer is there in that last quote - simply put, to continue to practice Buddhadharma. in the case of Sariputta it was to teach and lead fellow aspirants to stream-entry. but one may well, as a lay-person, feel a twinge of apprehension at such a lofty goal (i mean, come on Jon! we're talking about Sariputta here!). but practice is not limited exclusively to this worthy objective. one day our parents will grow old, their bodies become increasingly frail and their dependency on their children to return the love and compassion they have given them throughout their lives by helping them bathe, walk, provide clothing and food increase. such love and compassion returned is this practice. and although we can never hope to fully repay what they have done for us during our lives, this care is our means of acknowledging and respecting it.
ofcourse, i've only touched briefly and limitedly on the issue and certainly the practice of Buddhadharma is much more than just caring for one's parents. and this care and love we return to them should not be put off or postponed until their old age, rather it is a life long practice. similarly, we are not indebted exclusively, and neither should our compassion be limited to, them. it is much, much greater than that. and, with this point in mind i would like to close with a quote from the Tannisho which really illustrates how far this debt extends and provides much more to consider -
"As for me, Shinran, I have never said the nembutsu even once for the repose of my departed father and mother. For all sentient beings, without exception, have been our parents and brothers and sisters in the course of countless lives in the many states of existence. On attaining Buddhahood after this present life, we can save every one of them.
Were saying the nembutsu indeed a good act in which I strove through my own powers, then I might direct the merit thus gained towards saving my father and mother. But this is not the case.
If, however, simply abandoning self-power, we quickly attain enlightenment in the Pure Land, we will be able to save, by means of transcendent powers, first those with whom we have close karmic relations, whatever karmic suffering they may have sunk to in the six realms through the four modes of birth."
- Tannisho Ch. 5
namu amida butsu
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
